Risks
Synthetic dollar vs fiat and RWA backed stablecoins
Last updated
Synthetic dollar vs fiat and RWA backed stablecoins
Last updated
Centralized stablecoins, such as USDC or USDT, provide stability and capital efficiency, but they introduce:
Unhedgeable custodial risk with bond collateral in regulated bank accounts which are prone to censorship.
A critical reliance upon the existing traditional banking infrastructure and country-specific evolving regulations.
A "return-free risk" for the user as the issuer internalizes the yield whilst exporting the risk of the depeg to users' holding the fiat stablecoin.
Represent an unsecured credit position to both the issuer and underlying bank holding the collateral assets while mixing these assets with other bank lending activities eg Silicon Valley Bank.
Other centralized stablecoins that use "Real World Assets" (RWAs) as the collateral backing & distribute the yield face the same confiscation & censorship risk.
CAMP is committed to transparency. It is crucial to highlight the risks associated with USDca, the actions taken to mitigate these risks, as well as plans to further manage and ameliorate these risks.
This section will discuss the following risks:
We would greatly appreciate any feedback or information you would like to see to help the protocol be as transparent as possible. If you believe any risk has not been adequately surfaced please reach out in Discord and notify the contributors.